Against Phenomenal Conservatism

Acta Analytica 26 (3):213-221 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, Michael Huemer has defended the Principle of Phenomenal Conservatism: If it seems to S that p, then, in the absence of defeaters, S thereby has at least some degree of justification for believing that p. This principle has potentially far-reaching implications. Huemer uses it to argue against skepticism and to defend a version of ethical intuitionism. I employ a reductio to show that PC is false. If PC is true, beliefs can yield justification for believing their contents in cases where, intuitively, they should not be able to do so. I argue that there are cases where a belief that p can behave like an appearance that p and thereby make it seem to one that p

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-22

Downloads
978 (#16,930)

6 months
198 (#20,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Hanna
Drexel University

References found in this work

Theory of knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer (ed.) - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ethical Intuitionism.Michael Huemer - 2005 - New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Compassionate phenomenal conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
Controlling attitudes.Pamela Hieronymi - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):45-74.

View all 17 references / Add more references