A slugfest of intuitions: contextualism and experimental design

Synthese 190 (10):1771-1792 (2013)
Abstract
This paper considers ways that experimental design can affect judgments about informally presented context shifting experiments. Reasons are given to think that judgments about informal context shifting experiments are affected by an exclusive reliance on binary truth value judgments and by experimenter bias. Exclusive reliance on binary truth value judgments may produce experimental artifacts by obscuring important differences of degree between the phenomena being investigated. Experimenter bias is an effect generated when, for example, experimenters disclose (even unconsciously) their own beliefs about the outcome of an experiment. Eliminating experimenter bias from context shifting experiments makes it far less obvious what the “intuitive” responses to those experiments are. After it is shown how those different kinds of bias can affect judgments about informal context shifting experiments, those experiments are revised to control for those forms of bias. The upshot of these investigations is that participants in the contextualist debate who employ informal experiments should pay just as much attention to the design of their experiments as those who employ more formal experimental techniques if they want to avoid obscuring the phenomena they aim to uncover
Keywords Contextualism  Experimental design  Experimental bias   Linguistic experiments  Intuitions  Metaphilosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0261-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
The Meaning of 'Meaning'.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise.Wesley Buckwalter - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):378-410.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Experimenting on Contextualism.Hansen Nat & Chemla Emmanuel - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (3):286-321.
Contrasting Cases.Nat Hansen - 2014 - In James Beebe (ed.), Advances in Experimental Epistemology. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 71-95.
Whither Experimental Semantics?Michael Devitt - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (1):5-36.
Experimenting with Phenomenology.Shaun Gallagher & Jesper B. Sorensen - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):119-134.
Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
Randomization and the Design of Experiments.Peter Urbach - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
Form and Function in Experimental Design.Alvin E. Roth - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):427-428.
Experiments as Exhibits and Experiments as Tests.Robert Sugden - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):291-302.
The Design and Analysis of Scientific Experiments.Kan Chen Peng - 1967 - Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley Pub. Co..
Added to PP index
2012-09-24

Total downloads
359 ( #9,238 of 2,225,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #423,227 of 2,225,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature