Hypatia 20 (4):59-79 (2005)

Authors
Louise Antony
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Abstract
Feminism is an antiauthoritarian movement that has sought to unmask many traditional “authorities” as ungrounded. Given this, it might seem as if feminists are required to abandon the concept of authority altogether. But, we argue, the exercise of authority enables us to coordinate our efforts to achieve larger social goods and, hence, should be preserved. Instead, what is needed and what we provide for here is a way to distinguish legitimate authority from objectionable authoritarianism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2000, 2005
DOI 10.1353/hyp.2005.0125
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Trust and Antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argumentative Injustice.Patrick Bondy - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):263-278.
Academic Autonomy.Sylvia Burrow - 2011 - In Andrea O'Reilly & Lynn O'Brien Hallstein (eds.), In Being and Thinking as an Academic Mother: Theory and Narritive. Toronto, ON: Dementer Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Karen Barad’s Agential Realism and Reflexive Epistemic Authority.Anna Mudde - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:65-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
7 ( #961,082 of 2,326,025 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,025 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes