International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):137-146 (1998)
AbstractThis paper explores and criticizes Henry Sidgwick’s conception of the ethical societies he helped found at the end of the nineteenth century. I argue that the societies were not as involved in practical and political problems as one might have expected, and that the theoretical justification offered by Sidgwick -- that the primary obstacles to “right living” lie in our minds and hearts -- is not altogether satisfying. Sidgwick’s nearly exclusive emphasis on the problem of moral knowledge is then contrasted with John Dewey’s attention to moral motivation; and Dewey’s more energetic involvement in current affairs and social issues is set in the context of his distinctive view of the relation between theory and practice. Finally, Sidgwick’s modest hopes for the ethical societies, and the reasons for that modesty, are compared with the confidence that permeated an earlier incarnation of the ethical society, Ben Franklin’s Junto club.
Similar books and articles
Ethical theory and practice: Is there a gap? [REVIEW]John Hoaglund - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (3):201 - 205.
Practical Ethics: A Collection of Addresses and Essays.Henry Sidgwick - 1898 - Oxford University Press.
Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Using the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines as a paradigm for ethics training. [REVIEW]Daniel E. Palmer & Abe Zakhem - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):77 - 84.
Clinical pragmatism: Bridging theory and practice.Joseph J. Fins, Franklin G. Miller & Matthew D. Bacchetta - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):37-42.
Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and his Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips.Anthony Skelton - 2013 - Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 12.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads