International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243 (2009)
A definition of pseudoscience is proposed, according to which a statement is pseudoscientific if and only if it (1) pertains to an issue within the domains of science, (2) is not epistemically warranted, and (3) is part of a doctrine whose major proponents try to create the impression that it is epistemically warranted. This approach has the advantage of separating the definition of pseudoscience from the justification of the claim that science represents the most epistemically warranted statements. The definition is used to explain why proponents of widely divergent criteria for the demarcation between science and pseudoscience tend to be in almost complete agreement on the particular demarcations that should presumably be based on these general criteria
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.John Dupré - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism.Philip Kitcher & Marcel C. La Follette - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.
Citations of this work BETA
What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience.Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1177-1198.
Science Denial as a Form of Pseudoscience.Sven Ove Hansson - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63:39-47.
Similar books and articles
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Methodology, Epistemology and Conventions: Popper's Bad Start.John Preston - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:314 - 322.
Can't Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion? Demarcation Revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2010 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem.B. D. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
Parapsychology and the Demarcation Problem.Robert L. Morris - 1987 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):241 – 251.
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
The Rotating Disk Argument and Humean Supervenience: Cutting the Gordian Knot.Paul Teller - 2002 - Analysis 62 (3):205–210.
Cutting a Gordian Knot the Solution to Newcomb's Problem.Corliss G. Swain - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (3):391 - 409.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads53 ( #98,681 of 2,168,638 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,638 )
How can I increase my downloads?