Inquiry 3 (1-4):270 – 277 (1960)
Many writers assume one of the major functions (if not the major function) of ethical theory is to analyze the “ordinary language”; of moral discourse. This paper argues that different social groups develop quite different concepts of values; that there are many “ordinary languages.”; What analysts often in practice arc concerned with is middle-class ethical usage. In addition, it is argued that widely accepted moral usages may be incorrect because they are based on faulty empirical generalizations, pre-scientific opinions, or socially-determined prejudices. “Ordinary language”; needs to be viewed critically, therefore, rather than to be assumed as correct.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On the Verification of Statements About Ordinary Language.Benson Mates - 1958 - Inquiry 1 (1-4):161 – 171.
Philosophers and Ordinary Language.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (3):317-328.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Medical Ethics, Ordinary Concepts, and Ordinary Lives.Christopher Cowley - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Vindication of the Humpty Dumpty Attitude Towards Language.Herman Tennesen - 1960 - Inquiry 3 (1-4):185 – 198.
Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument.Sally Parker Ryan - 2010 - Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language.Francis Y. Lin - 1999 - Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy.Avner Baz - 2012 - Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads7 ( #521,343 of 2,163,904 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,904 )
How can I increase my downloads?