Philosophy of Science 26 (4):325-337 (1959)

Within the past decade there has grown an acute and highly articulate group of critics of the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory,--the so-called "Copenhagen Interpretation." The writings of people like Bopp, Janossy, and particularly Bohm and Feyerabend, must be taken very seriously indeed. The future of some important discussions in the philosophy and the logic of science rests with these individuals. But they have, in their own writings, occasionally matched the inelegancies of Bohr and Heisenberg with as many inelegancies of their own. The present paper is meant to present a quintet of considerations which may possibly lead to a reassessment of the issues between Bohr, Heisenberg, and their critics, especially Bohm and Feyerabend
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/287687
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Mario Bunge on Causality.Richard Schlegel - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (1):72-82.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
254 ( #42,418 of 2,499,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,163 of 2,499,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes