Authors
Hans Rott
Universität Regensburg
Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Abstract
A number of seminal papers on the logic of belief change by Alchourrön, Gärden-fors, and Makinson have given rise to what is now known as the AGM paradigm. The present discussion note is a response to Neil Tennant's [1994], which aims at a critical appraisal of the AGM approach and the introduction of an alternative approach. We show that important parts of Tennants's critical remarks are based on misunderstandings or on lack of information. In the course of doing this, we attend to some central philosophical issues in the theory of belief change, such as the choice of a representation for belief states and the meaning of an idealized rational agent.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/46.3.361
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Modellings for Theory Change.Adam Grove - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2):157-170.
The Knowledge Level.Allen Newell - 1982 - Artificial Intelligence 18 (1):81-132.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics.Neil Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
On Having Bad Contractions, Or: No Room for Recovery.Neil Tennant - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):241-266.
Discussion. Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics.Neil Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
A Plea for Accuracy.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1998 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 8 (3):221-224.
Handling Inconsistency in Knowledge Systems.Gerd Wagner - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):147-150.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Resource-Bounded Belief Revision and Contraction.Mark Jago - 2006 - In P. Torroni, U. Endriss, M. Baldoni & A. Omicini (eds.), Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies III. Springer. pp. 141--154.
Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics.Neil Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
Infinitary Belief Revision.Dongmo Zhang & Norman Foo - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (6):525-570.
Basic Infobase Change.Thomas Meyer - 2001 - Studia Logica 67 (2):215-242.
Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery).Hans Rott & Maurice Pagnucco - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):501-547.
Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Towards a Computational Approach.Neil Tennant - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):865-897.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
66 ( #154,973 of 2,427,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes