Logic, the a priori, and the empirical

Theoria 18 (2):171-177 (2003)

Abstract
The time-honored view that logic is a non-empirical enterprise is still widely accepted, but it is not always recognized that there are (at least) two distinct ways in which this view can be made precise. One way focuses on the knowledge we can have of logical matters, the other on the nature of the logical consequence relation itself. More specifically; the first way embodies the claim that knowledge of whether the logical consequence relation holds in a particular case is knowledge that can be had a priori (if at all). The second way presupposes a distinction between structural and non-structural properties and relations, and it holds that logical consequence is to be defined exdusively in terms of the former. It is shown that the two ways are not coextensive by giving an example of a logic that is non-empirical in the second way but not in the first
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI theoria200318214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,926
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Logic of Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):81 - 98.
The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Logic, Logics, and Logicism.Solomon Feferman - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):31-54.
The Concept of Logical Consequence.William H. Hanson - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (3):365-409.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logical Knowledge and Gettier Cases.Corine Besson - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):1-19.
Transcendental Logic Redefined.Manuel Bremer - 2008 - Review of Contemporary Philosophy 7.
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence.William H. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
Science and Ethics: Demarcation, Holism and Logical Consequences.Nick Zangwill - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):126-138.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
167 ( #50,493 of 2,310,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #59,124 of 2,310,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature