Moral education and the justification of basic moral standards: Replies to Clayton, Stevens and D’Olimpio

Journal of Moral Education 48 (4):529-539 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Matthew Clayton, David Stevens and Laura D’Olimpio have advanced a series of objections to arguments I set out in my recent book A Theory of Moral Education – in particular to the problem-of-sociality justification for basic moral standards. Here I reply to their objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Theory of Moral Education.Michael Hand - 2017 - London: Routledge.
Book review: Laura d’olimpio. Media and moral education: A philosophy of critical engagement. [REVIEW]Juan Rafael Macaranas - 2021 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 22 (2).
Hirst on rational moral education.Michael Hand - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (1):308-322.
Moral Education and Education in Altruism: Two Replies to Michael Hand.John White - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 50 (3):448-460.
Book Review: A Theory of Moral Education. [REVIEW]Philip Cam - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy in Schools 6 (1):116-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-11

Downloads
29 (#645,770)

6 months
9 (#376,877)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hand
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1904 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by C. B. Macpherson.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 14 references / Add more references