Nozick, prohibition, and no-fault motor insurance

Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):201–208 (2003)
Authors
Toby Handfield
Monash University
Abstract
Is a Nozickian theory of rights compatible with a no-fault motor insurance scheme? I say, Yes. The argument turns on an explication of the basis on which a Nozickian justifies the prohibition of merely risky activities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-5930.00246
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
148 ( #40,913 of 2,293,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #137,835 of 2,293,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature