Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):201–208 (2003)

Toby Handfield
Monash University
Is a Nozickian theory of rights compatible with a no-fault motor insurance scheme? I say, Yes. The argument turns on an explication of the basis on which a Nozickian justifies the prohibition of merely risky activities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-5930.00246
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
232 ( #40,418 of 2,433,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,938 of 2,433,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes