On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 98 (C):29-39 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the pursuitworthiness of philosophical ideas has changed over time, philosophical practice and methodology have not kept pace. The worthiness of a philosophical pursuit includes not only the ideas and objectives one pursues but also the methods with which one pursues them. In this paper, we articulate how empirical approaches benefit philosophy of science, particularly advocating for the use of qualitative methods for understanding the social and normative aspects of scientific inquiry. After situating qualitative methods within empirical philosophy of science, we discuss how to adapt these traditionally sociological methods to empirically inform philosophical questions. Our aim is to normalize and legitimize qualitative methods for philosophical purposes and discuss how they can elucidate descriptive and normative components of scientific practice in a more generalizable non-idealized manner. We contend that qualitative methods are particularly well suited to philosophical interest in the social norms of science, their achievability, and their mutability. Furthermore, unlike more historical case studies in philosophy, qualitative methods enable more confidence in generalizability, albeit limited, from a concrete sample to a larger class. We conclude by addressing anxieties about the distinctness of empirical philosophy of science from social epistemology and from sociology of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modeling as a Case for the Empirical Philosophy of Science.Ekaterina Svetlova - 2015 - In Susann Wagenknecht, Nancy J. Nersessian & Hanne Andersen (eds.), Empirical Philosophy of Science: Introducing Qualitative Methods into Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 65-82.
An Empirical Method for the Study of Exemplar Explanations.Mads Goddiksen - 2015 - In Susann Wagenknecht, Nancy J. Nersessian & Hanne Andersen (eds.), Empirical Philosophy of Science: Introducing Qualitative Methods into Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy.James Andow - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (8):1128-1141.
Anti- Naturalism: The Role of Non-Empirical Methods in Philosophy.Aaron Barth - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):196-206.
Prolegomena to an Empirical Philosophy of Science.Nancy Nersessian & Lisa Osbeck - 2015 - In Susann Wagenknecht, Nancy J. Nersessian & Hanne Andersen (eds.), Empirical Philosophy of Science: Introducing Qualitative Methods into Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-26

Downloads
76 (#277,319)

6 months
13 (#267,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nora Bettina Hangel
Universität Konstanz
Christopher ChoGlueck
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

References found in this work

Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
The role of trust in knowledge.John Hardwig - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (12):693-708.
Social empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 1994 - Noûs 28 (3):325-343.

View all 44 references / Add more references