Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):163-183 (2007)
Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is much more philosophically interesting than has in general been recognized. Since it is the only well-developed form of applied consequentialism, it is a testing-ground for consequentialism and for the counterfactual analysis that it requires. Ten classes of philosophical problems that affect the practical performance of cost–benefit analysis are investigated: topic selection, dependence on the decision perspective, dangers of super synopticism and undue centralization, prediction problems, the indeterminateness of our control over future decisions, the need to exclude certain consequences for moral reasons, bias in the delimitation of consequences, incommensurability of consequences, difficulties in defending the essential requirement of transferability across contexts, and the normatively questionable but equally essential assumption of interpersonal compensability. (Published Online July 31 2007).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Coping with the Unpredictable Effects of Future Technologies.Sven Hansson - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):137-149.
The Harmful Influence of Decision Theory on Ethics.Sven Ove Hansson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):585-593.
The Moral Problem of Risk Impositions: A Survey of the Literature.Madeleine Hayenhjelm & Jonathan Wolff - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (S1):E1-E142.
Classification and Moral Evaluation of Uncertainties in Engineering Modeling.Colleen Murphy, Paolo Gardoni & Charles Harris - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):553-570.
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.
Similar books and articles
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives.Matthew D. Adler & Eric A. Posner (eds.) - 2001 - University of Chicago Press.
Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean.Peter Railton - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261-271.
Matthew D. Adler and Eric A. Posner, Eds., Cost‐Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives:Cost‐Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives. [REVIEW]Richard S. Markovits - 2005 - Ethics 115 (3):593-642.
Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:217 - 232.
Science, Democracy, and Public Policy.Kristin Shrader‐Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review 6 (2-3):255-264.
Values, Preferences, and the Citizen-Consumer Distinction in Cost-Benefit Analysis.Shepley W. Orr - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):107-130.
Ethical Issues in Environmental Decision Making and the Limitations of Cost/Benefit Analysis (CBA).Simon Glynn - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (1):27 - 39.
Book Review:Thoughtful Economic Man: Essays on Rationality, Moral Rules and Benevolence. Gay Meeks. [REVIEW]Donald C. Hubin - 1993 - Ethics 103 (3):572-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #68,434 of 2,172,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,383 of 2,172,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?