Recovery and epistemic residue

Abstract
Two recent defences of the recovery postulate for contraction of belief sets are analyzed. It is concluded that recovery is defensible as a by-product of a formalization that is idealized in the sense of being simplified for the sake of clarity. However, recovery does not seem to be a required feature of the doxastic behaviour of ideal (perfectly rational) agents. It is reasonable to expect that there should be epistemic residues (remnants of rejected beliefs), but not that these should always suffice to recover all the original beliefs if the discarded belief is reinstated.
Keywords belief revision  epistemic residue  ideal agent  idealization  recovery  theory change
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1008316915066
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,641
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Transmission Failure, AGM-Style.Jake Chandler - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (2):383-398.
Formalization in Philosophy.Sven Ove Hansson - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):162-175.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Note on Partial Meet Package Contraction.Jun Li - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):139-142.
Eligible Contraction.John Cantwell - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):167 - 182.
On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Without Recovery. [REVIEW]Eduardo L. Fermé - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):127-137.
Recovery Recovered.StephenMurray Glaister - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (2):171-206.
Belief Contraction Without Recovery.Sven Ove Hansson - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):251 - 260.
Systematic Withdrawal.Thomas Meyer, Johannes Heidema, Willem Labuschagne & Louise Leenen - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):415-443.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

8 ( #486,993 of 2,158,164 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,164 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums