Revisiting child‐based objections to commercial surrogacy

Bioethics 24 (7):341-347 (2010)
Authors
Jason Hanna
Northern Illinois University
Abstract
ABSTRACTMany critics of commercial surrogate motherhood argue that it violates the rights of children. In this paper, I respond to several versions of this objection. The most common version claims that surrogacy involves child‐selling. I argue that while proponents of surrogacy have generally failed to provide an adequate response to this objection, it can be overcome. After showing that the two most prominent arguments for the child‐selling objection fail, I explain how the commissioning couple can acquire parental rights by paying the surrogate only for her reproductive labor. My explanation appeals to the idea that parental rights are acquired by those who have claims over the reproductive labor that produces the child, not necessarily by those who actually perform the labor. This account clarifies how commercial surrogacy differs from commercial adoption. In the final section of the paper, I consider and reject three further child‐based objections to commercial surrogacy: that it establishes a market in children's attributes, that it requires courts to stray from the best interests standard in determining custodial rights, and that it requires the surrogate to neglect her parental responsibilities. Since each of these objections fails, children's rights probably do not pose an obstacle to the acceptability of commercial surrogacy arrangements.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/biot.2010.24.issue-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby‐Selling?R. Jo Kornegay - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.
Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby-Selling?R. Jo Kornegay - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.
Rethinking “Commercial” Surrogacy in Australia.Jenni Millbank - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):477-490.
Commercial Surrogacy: A Liberal, Feminist Analysis.Louisa Lee Moon - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total downloads
1 ( #1,048,971 of 2,275,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,297 of 2,275,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature