Second-order logic and logicism

Mind 99 (393):91-99 (1990)
Some widely accepted arguments in the philosophy of mathematics are fallacious because they rest on results that are provable only by using assumptions that the con- clusions of these arguments seek to undercut. These results take the form of bicon- ditionals linking statements of logic with statements of mathematics. George Boolos has given an argument of this kind in support of the claim that certain facts about second-order logic support logicism, the view that mathematics—or at least part of it—reduces to logic. Hilary Putnam has offered a similar argument for the view that it is indifferent whether we take mathematics to be about objects or about what follows from certain postulates. In this paper I present and rebut these arguments
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/XCIX.393.91
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
William Demopoulos (1994). The Contemporary Interest of an Old Doctrine. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:209 - 216.
Alexander Paseau (2010). Pure Second-Order Logic with Second-Order Identity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):351-360.
Richard Jeffrey (2002). Logicism Lite. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.
Timothy Bays (2000). The Fruits of Logicism. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):415-421.
Ian Proops (2006). Russell’s Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

39 ( #123,851 of 1,925,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,979 of 1,925,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.