Structured Propositions as Types

Mind 120 (477):11-52 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I defend an account of the nature of propositional content according to which the proposition expressed by a declarative sentence is a certain type of action a speaker performs in uttering that sentence. On this view, the semantic contents of proper names turn out to be types of reference acts. By carefully individuating these types, it is possible to provide new solutions to Frege’s puzzles about names in identity- and belief-sentences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-09

Downloads
432 (#43,599)

6 months
27 (#107,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Hanks
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

Predication and the Frege–Geach problem.Indrek Reiland - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (1):141-159.
The metaphysics of propositional constituency.Lorraine Keller - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5-6):655-678.
Force cancellation.François Recanati - 2019 - Synthese 196 (4):1403-1424.
On cancellation.Peter Hanks - 2019 - Synthese 196 (4):1385-1402.

View all 92 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
Yes and no.I. Rumfitt - 2000 - Mind 109 (436):781-823.
Rejection.Timothy Smiley - 1996 - Analysis 56 (1):1–9.
Propositions.George Bealer - 1998 - Mind 107 (425):1-32.
Translating names.John P. Burgess - 2005 - Analysis 65 (3):196-205.

Add more references