The Happy Fish of the Disputers

Asian Philosophy 22 (3):239-256 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The happy fish episode from the outer chapters of the Zhuangzi poses enormous difficulty for interpreters. While it may appear to surprisingly resemble the dialectic in Western philosophy, any attempt to analyse it in terms of the patterns of inference familiar to the West is often frustrated by the ostensible queerness that defies such treatment. The following examination of the dialogue in the episode is intended to address the difficulty and to provide a reasoned explanation for both the surface resemblance and apparent queerness. I suggest that the dialogue becomes perfectly intelligible, if it is read against the backdrop of the disputations practiced in ancient China. My contention is that the real purpose of the dialogue is to expose the fundamental unreliability of the logic of the disputers by means of the logic itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The relatively happy fish.Chad Hansen - 2003 - Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):145 – 164.
The relatively happy fish revisited.Norman Y. Teng - 2006 - Asian Philosophy 16 (1):39 – 47.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Happiness.Theodore Benditt - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (1):1 - 20.
Stanley fish and the old quarrel between rhetoric and philosophy.David Roochnik - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):225-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-29

Downloads
57 (#287,334)

6 months
6 (#581,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The ways of paradox, and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1976 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knowing and asserting.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):489-523.
Must we know what we say?Matthew Weiner - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.
Dialetheism.Francesco Berto, Graham Priest & Zach Weber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2018 (2018).
``Must we Know What we Say?".Matt Weiner - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.

View all 22 references / Add more references