Wittgenstein and the Real Numbers

History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3):219-245 (2010)

Abstract
When it comes to Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics, even sympathetic admirers are cowed into submission by the many criticisms of influential authors in that field. They say something to the effect that Wittgenstein does not know enough about or have enough respect for mathematics, to take him as a serious philosopher of mathematics. They claim to catch Wittgenstein pooh-poohing the modern set-theoretic extensional conception of a real number. This article, however, will show that Wittgenstein's criticism is well grounded. A real number, as an 'extension', is a homeless fiction; 'homeless' in that it neither is supported by anything nor supports anything. The picture of a real number as an 'extension' is not supported by actual practice in calculus; calculus has nothing to do with 'extensions'. The extensional, set-theoretic conception of a real number does not give a foundation for real analysis, either. The so-called complete theory of real numbers, which is essentially an extensional approach, does not define (in any sense of the word) the set of real numbers so as to justify their completeness, despite the common belief to the contrary. The only correct foundation of real analysis consists in its being 'existential axiomatics'. And in real analysis, as existential axiomatics, a point on the real line need not be an 'extension'
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1080/01445340.2010.485350
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,966
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1975 - University of Chicago Press.
Notebooks, 1914-1916.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1969 - University of Chicago Press.
Philosophical Remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein, R. Hargreaves & R. White - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (103):178-180.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wittgenstein on Set Theory and the Enormously Big.Ryan Dawson - 2016 - Philosophical Investigations 39 (4):313-334.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Numbers Are Real?Kenneth L. Manders - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:253 - 269.
Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
Wittgenstein and Finitism.Mathieu Marion - 1995 - Synthese 105 (2):141 - 176.
Groundwork for Weak Analysis.António M. Fernandes & Fernando Ferreira - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):557-578.
Is Time a Continuum of Instants.Michael Dummett - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):497-515.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total views
101 ( #72,771 of 2,236,018 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #761,889 of 2,236,018 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature