Why Meat is Moral, and Veggies are Immoral

Abstract

You are in a grocery store, and thinking of buying some meat. You think you know what buying and eating this meat would mean for your taste buds, your nutrition, and your pocketbook, and let's assume that on those grounds it looks like a good deal. But now you want to think about the..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

You are what you eat: Meat, novel protein foods, and consumptive freedom. [REVIEW]Volkert Beekman - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):185-196.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):39-48.
Moderation, morals, and meat.Frederick Ferré - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):391-406.
Eating Meat and Reading Diamond.Andrew Gleeson - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):157-175.
Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters?Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):579-596.
The puzzle of pure moral deference.Sarah McGrath - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):321-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
262 (#69,837)

6 months
14 (#114,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Consequentialism and Nonhuman Animals.Tyler John & Jeff Sebo - 2020 - In Douglas W. Portmore (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 564-591.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references