Is Mozi a utilitarian philosopher?

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):382-400 (2006)

Changchi Hao
Wuhan University (Alumni)
In this essay I argue that Mozi's philosophy is anything but utilitarianism by way of analysing four ethical theories. Utilitarianism is an ethics in which the moral subject is an atomic individual human being, and its concern is how to fulfill the interests of the individual self and the social majority. Confucian ethics is centered on the notion of the family and its basic question is that of priority in the relationship between the small self and the enlarged or collective self. Opposite to these two moral theories is Mozi's ethics: The interests that Mozi is primarily concerned with are not the interests of my individual self or my collective self, but the interests of the other. The fulfillment of the material needs of the other is my moral obligation. The arguments are centered on the three basic concepts, "the I," "the we," and "the other." The significance of Mozi's thought in modemrn or postmodern context lies in its striking resemblance to the philosophy of a contemporary western philosopher, Levinas. In both Mozi and Levinas, there is a suspension of utilitarianism
Keywords universal love  principle of utility   ren   yi  asymmetrical relation  the I  the we  the other
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-006-0015-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Totality and Infinity.Emmanuel Levinas - 1961/1969 - Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority.Emmanuel Levinas - 1969 - Distribution for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mozi's Moral Theory: Breaking the Hermeneutical Stalemate.Daniel M. Johnson - 2011 - Philosophy East and West 61 (2):347-364.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #118,180 of 2,285,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #251,846 of 2,285,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature