An Activity Theory Approach to surfacing the pedagogical object in a primary school mathematics classroom

Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 9 (1):53-69 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a methodology for using Activity Theory (AT) to investigate pedagogical practices in primary school mathematics classrooms by selecting object-oriented pedagogical activity as the unit of analysis. While an understanding of object-oriented activity is central to Activity Theory (AT), the notion of object is a frequently debated and often misunderstood one. The conceptual confusion surrounding the object arises both from difficulties related to translating the original Russian conceptualisation of object-oriented activity into English as well as from the different interpretations of the object currently in use within two contemporary approaches in activity theory. This paper seeks to clarify understandings of the object by exploring notions of object oriented activity. To this end, the paper traces the historical development of the object through Leontiev (1978; 1981) and Engeström’s (1987; 1999) expansion of Vygotsky’s original triadic understanding of object oriented activity. Drawing on Basil Bernstein’s (1996) notion of evaluative criteria as those rules that transmit the criteria for the production of a legitimate text, the paper goes on to elaborate a methodology for using AT to analyse observational data by developing the notion of “evaluative episodes” as pedagogical moments in which the pedagogical object is made visible. Findings indicate that an evaluative episode can serve as an analytical space in which the dynamism of an activity system is momentarily frozen, enabling one to model human activity in the system under investigation and, hence, in this study, to understand pedagogy in context

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

24 Object relations theory and activity theory: A proposed link by way of the procedural sequence model.Anthony Ryle - 1999 - In Yrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen & Raija-Leena Punamäki-Gitai (eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 407.
Breaking away from Capital? Theorising activity in the shadow of Marx.Peter Jones - 2009 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 11 (1):45-58.
An Interdisciplinary Concept of Activity.Andy Blunden - 2009 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 11 (1):1-26.
Losing Oneself : On the Value of Full Attention.Dorothea Debus - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1174-1191.
Transforming the Object in Product Design.Sampsa Hyysalo - 2002 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 4 (1):59-83.
Who is acting in an activity system?Ritva Engeström - 2009 - In Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels & Kris D. Gutierrez (eds.), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 257.
Mind as an Evolving Triadic Entity.Francesco Belfiore - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:5-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
6 (#1,353,689)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1975 - In Science and Society. International Publishers. pp. 19-581.
The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1939 - Science and Society 3 (4):563-568.
Pegagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique.B. Bernstein - 2001 - British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):92-93.
Activity, Consciousness, and Personality.A. N. Leont’ev - 1978 - Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, Nj.
Class, Codes and Control.Basil Bernstein - 1972 - British Journal of Educational Studies 20 (2):236-237.

View all 8 references / Add more references