Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):47 – 64 (2006)

Should advance directives (ADs) such as living wills be employed to direct the care of the severely demented? In considering this question, I focus primarily on the claims of Rebecca Dresser who objects in principle to the use of ADs in this context. Dresser has persuasively argued that ADs are both theoretically incoherent and ethically dangerous. She proceeds to advocate a Best Interest Standard as the best way for deciding when and how the demented ought to be treated. I put forth a compromise position: both ADs and the Best Interest Standard have roles to play in guiding the care of the severely demented.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310500499195
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Getting Back to the Fundamentals of Clinical Ethics.Laurence Mccullough - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):1 – 6.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
143 ( #60,893 of 2,326,033 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #38,480 of 2,326,033 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes