Austin on perception

Philosophy 38 (July):253-263 (1963)
‘After it, the philosophy of perception cannot be discussed in ways it usually was discussed before.’ This is said about Sense and Sensibilia by Mr Bernard Williams in an article, ‘J. L. Austin's philosophy’, published in the Oxford Magazine of 6 December 1962. It is not quite clear what Mr Williams means by the remark. It might be understood as an endorsement of Austin's insistence that philosophers have lapsed into crudity and error through their neglect of distinctions marked by the rich variety of linguistic expressions in ordinary use. But Mr Williams himself in his article makes some effective criticisms of Austin's opinion that ordinary language is a reservoir of philosophically significant distinctions, and points out also that Austin's own practice in these lectures did not exhibit any close connection between his survey of the variety of the uses of such words as ‘look’, ‘seem’, ‘appear’, and his criticism of theories of perception
Keywords Epistemology  Illusion  Perception  Sense Data  Austin  Ayer
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100061775
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,157
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
To Austin or Not to Austin, That's the Disjunction.Robert Schwartz - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Austin and Perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
Recent Work on Perception.Peter K. Machamer - 1970 - American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (January):1-22.
Recent Anglo-American Views on Perception.Kenneth T. Gallagher - 1964 - International Philosophical Quarterly 4 (February):122-141.
Austin on Some Problems of Perception.Jack Pustilnik - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.
Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory?A. J. Ayer - 1967 - Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
Austin and the Argument From Illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #190,123 of 2,171,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums