Austin on perception

Philosophy 38 (July):253-263 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX


‘After it, the philosophy of perception cannot be discussed in ways it usually was discussed before.’ This is said about Sense and Sensibilia by Mr Bernard Williams in an article, ‘J. L. Austin's philosophy’, published in the Oxford Magazine of 6 December 1962. It is not quite clear what Mr Williams means by the remark. It might be understood as an endorsement of Austin's insistence that philosophers have lapsed into crudity and error through their neglect of distinctions marked by the rich variety of linguistic expressions in ordinary use. But Mr Williams himself in his article makes some effective criticisms of Austin's opinion that ordinary language is a reservoir of philosophically significant distinctions, and points out also that Austin's own practice in these lectures did not exhibit any close connection between his survey of the variety of the uses of such words as ‘look’, ‘seem’, ‘appear’, and his criticism of theories of perception



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,003

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Austin or not to Austin, that's the disjunction.Robert Schwartz - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Austin and the argument from illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Austin on some problems of perception.Jack Pustilnik - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.
Recent Anglo-american views on perception.Kenneth T. Gallagher - 1964 - International Philosophical Quarterly 4 (February):122-141.
Recent work on perception.Peter K. Machamer - 1970 - American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1):1-22.
Austin and perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.


Added to PP

34 (#351,636)

6 months
1 (#484,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Austin's Epistemology and His Critics.Jack Pustilnik - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (148):163 - 165.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references