A surprise for Horwich (and some advocates of the fine-tuning argument (which does not include Horwich (as far as I know)))

Philosophical Studies 161 (2):247-261 (2012)
Abstract
The judgment that a given event is epistemically improbable is necessary but insufficient for us to conclude that the event is surprising. Paul Horwich has argued that surprising events are, in addition, more probable given alternative background assumptions that are not themselves extremely improbable. I argue that Horwich’s definition fails to capture important features of surprises and offer an alternative definition that accords better with intuition. An important application of Horwich’s analysis has arisen in discussions of fine-tuning arguments. In the second part of the paper I consider the implications for this argument of employing my definition of surprise. I argue that advocates of fine-tuning arguments are not justified in attaching significance to the fact that we are surprised by examples of fine-tuning.
Keywords Surprise  Fine-tuning  Horwich  Multiverse  Intelligent design
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-011-9732-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,553
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Universes.John Leslie - 1989 - Routledge.
Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes.Roger White - 2000 - Noûs 34 (2):260–276.
Fine-Tuning, Multiple Universes, and the 'This Universe' Objection.Neil Manson - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):67 - 83.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Fine-Tuning Argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Fine-Tuning and the Infrared Bull's-Eye.John Roberts - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):287-303.
The Fine-Tuning Argument.M. C. Bradley - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):451-466.
The Coincidences of Time Travel.Phil Dowe - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):574-589.
Fine-Tuning as Evidence for a Multiverse: Why White is Wrong. [REVIEW]Mark Douglas Saward - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):243-253.
Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument.Mark A. Walker & M. Milan - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-26

Total downloads

115 ( #42,544 of 2,168,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,314 of 2,168,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums