A surprise for Horwich (and some advocates of the fine-tuning argument (which does not include Horwich (as far as I know)))
Philosophical Studies 161 (2):247-261 (2012)
The judgment that a given event is epistemically improbable is necessary but insufficient for us to conclude that the event is surprising. Paul Horwich has argued that surprising events are, in addition, more probable given alternative background assumptions that are not themselves extremely improbable. I argue that Horwich’s definition fails to capture important features of surprises and offer an alternative definition that accords better with intuition. An important application of Horwich’s analysis has arisen in discussions of fine-tuning arguments. In the second part of the paper I consider the implications for this argument of employing my definition of surprise. I argue that advocates of fine-tuning arguments are not justified in attaching significance to the fact that we are surprised by examples of fine-tuning.
|Keywords||Surprise Fine-tuning Horwich Multiverse Intelligent design|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy.Nick Bostrom - 2002 - Routledge.
Fine-Tuning, Multiple Universes, and the 'This Universe' Objection.Neil Manson - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):67 - 83.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fine-Tuning and the Infrared Bull's-Eye.John Roberts - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):287-303.
Theodore Drange on the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Critique.Stephen E. Parrish - 1999 - Philosophia Christi 1 (2):73 - 87.
What Fine-Tuning's Got to Do with It: A Reply to Weisberg.R. White - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):676-679.
Fine-Tuning as Evidence for a Multiverse: Why White is Wrong. [REVIEW]Mark Douglas Saward - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):243-253.
Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument.Mark A. Walker & M. Milan - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.
Explaining the Fine Tuning of the Universe to Us and the Fine Tuning of Us to the Universe.T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68 (68):25-50.
A Response to Parrish on the Fine-Tuning Argument.Theodore M. Drange - 2000 - Philosophia Christi 2 (1):61 - 67.
Multiple Universes and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Response to Rodney Holder.Michael Rota - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):556–576.
Added to index2011-04-26
Total downloads115 ( #42,544 of 2,168,327 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #61,314 of 2,168,327 )
How can I increase my downloads?