Bargaining for Justice

David Gauthier's Morals by Agreement presents a partial theory of distributive justice. It is partial because it applies only to the distribution of gains from joint endeavors, or what we may call the ‘social surplus’ from cooperation. This surplus is the benefit we receive from cooperation insofar as this is greater than what we might have produced through individual efforts without interaction with others. The central core of Gauthier's theory of distributive justice is his bargaining theory of ‘minimax relative concession’ or MRC. Whether his theory is compelling turns essentially on whether MRC is workable and compelling. It is this issue that I wish to address
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0265052500000066
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bargaining and Justice.David Gauthier - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):29.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Orthodox Rational Choice Contractarianism: Before and After Gauthier.Michael Moehler - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (2):113-131.
Years of Moral Epistemology: A Bibliography.Laura Donohue & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):217-229.
The "Inescapable" Prisoner's Dilemma.Ishtiyaque Hussein Haji - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #349,270 of 2,289,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #309,713 of 2,289,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature