Philosophy of Science 69 (2):256-265 (2002)
Recently, Rueger and Sharp (1996) and Koperski (1998) have been concerned to show that certain procedural accounts of model confirmation are compromised by non‐linear dynamics. We suggest that the issues raised are better approached by considering whether chaotic data analysis methods allow for reliable inference from data. We provide a framework and an example of this approach.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Choosing Between Confirmation Theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):277-293.
When Good Theories Make Bad Predictions.Vadim Batitsky & Zoltan Domotor - 2007 - Synthese 157 (1):79 - 103.
Data Meet Theory: Up Close and Inferentially Personal.Ioannis Votsis - 2011 - Synthese 182 (1):89 - 100.
From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #91,582 of 2,177,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?