Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):50-54 (2007)
Crisp is right to detect a clash between Dancy's leading formulation of holism about reasons and the phenomenon of invariance. Replying to Crisp on behalf of the particularist, I suggest a better formulation of holism modelled on a standard treatment in the philosophy of language of context-sensitive expressions. Key Words: context-sensitivity Crisp Dancy holism invariance particularism.
|Keywords||Dancy holism Crisp invariance particularism context-sensitivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roger Crisp, Reasons and the Good:Reasons and the Good.Bart Schultz - 2007 - Ethics 118 (1):143-146.
Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All.Anna Bergqvist - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Counterexamples to Principle Beta: A Response to Crisp and Warfield.Erik Carlson - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):730-737.
Review of R. Crisp's Reasons and the Good. [REVIEW]Jussi Suikkanen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):503–505.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #153,907 of 2,158,457 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,692 of 2,158,457 )
How can I increase my downloads?