Category mistakes in m&e

Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):165–180 (2003)
Abstract
Theories of causation may imply that your birth causes your death, which seems odd in the way that it is not odd to say that your birth precedes your death. Theories of knowledge may imply that the object of knowledge is the same as the object of belief, although we know but do not believe facts and we can know a proposition without knowing whether it is true
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00007.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reasons and That‐Clauses.James Pryor - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):217-244.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Category Mistakes and Classification.Robert Sharpe - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):204-207.
Two Mistakes Regarding the Principal Principle.Christopher J. G. Meacham - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):407-431.
The Persistence of Category Mistakes in Psychology.Per Holth - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:203 - 219.
Category Mistakes Are Meaningful.Ofra Magidor - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (6):553-581.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
51 ( #104,319 of 2,180,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,536 of 2,180,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums