Depth and Distance in Berkeley's Theory of Vision

History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (1):101 - 117 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley and the spatiality of vision.Rick Grush - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):413-442.
Berkeley's revolution in vision.Margaret Atherton - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The passive eye: gaze and subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett).Branka Arsić - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Is distance an original factor in vision?William S. Haymond - 1961 - Modern Schoolman 39 (November):39-60.
Berkeley, helmholtz, the moon illusion, and two visual systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Berkeley's theory of vision and its reception.Margaret Atherton - 2005 - In Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press. pp. 94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
50 (#303,392)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.Katherine Dunlop - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):525-559.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references