Classical Quarterly 69 (2):858-879 (2019)

Authors
Benjamin Harriman
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
In his Meditations, Marcus Aurelius repeatedly presents a disjunction between two conceptions of the natural world. Either the universe is ruled by providence or there are atoms. At 4.3, we find perhaps its most succinct statement: ἀνανεωσάμενος τὸ διεζευγμένον τό⋅ ἤτοι πρόνοια ἢ ἄτομοι. The formulation of the disjunction differs; at 7.32, being composed of atoms is contrasted with a stronger sort of unity that may survive death. In 10.6 and 11.18 Marcus simply offers φύσις in opposition. On the surface, the contrast between the theory of atomism and the acceptance of providence seems to not warrant the term ‘disjunction’; it seems possible to accept both atomism and a causally determined providential universe. Yet, it is agreed on all sides, in the recent literature, that the relevant contrast for Marcus is not between the atomist and the non-atomist views of the constitution of the natural world as such but between two entailments that follow from the atomist Epicurean and the non-atomist Stoic advocacy of these positions. The contrast is between the providential ordering of the Stoic universe and the chaotic chance-ridden Epicurean model.
Keywords Ancient philosophy  Roman philosophy  Epicureanism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838820000051
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Stoic Criterion of Identity.David Sedley - 1982 - Phronesis 27 (3):255-275.
Heraclitus : The cosmic fragments.G. S. Kirk - 1956 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 146:128-133.
Contemplative Withdrawal in the Hellenistic Age.Eric Brown - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):79-89.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Marcus Aurelius.John Sellars - 2015 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Marcus Aurelius: A Guide for the Perplexed.William O. Stephens - 2012 - London, UK: Bloomsbury (Continuum).
Marcus Aurelius in Contemporary Philosophy.John Sellars - 2012 - In Marcel van Ackeren (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Wiley-Blackwell.
Stoicism at War: From Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius to James Stockdale.Konrad Banicki - 2015 - In Tadeusz Marian Ostrowski, Iwona Sikorska & Krzysztof Gerc (eds.), Resilience and Health in a Fast-Changing World. Jagiellonian University Press. pp. 47-58.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-26

Total views
6 ( #1,137,225 of 2,518,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes