Do employers comply with civil/human rights legislation? New evidence from new zealand job application forms
Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):207-221 (2002)
This study assesses the extent to which job application forms violate the New Zealand Human Rights Act. The sample for the study includes 229 job application forms, collected from a variety of large and small, public- and private-sector organizations that together employ approximately 200,000 workers. Two hundred and four or 88% of the job application forms contain at least one violation of the Act. One hundred and sixty five or 72% contain two or more and 140 or 61% contain three or more violations. The most common violations concern age, gender, nationality, and disability. The least common concern political opinion, ethical belief, religious belief, and sexual orientation. Despite widespread violations, many forms do have non-discriminatory questions that yield the same kind of useful information as discriminatory questions. Employers could incorporate these into their job application forms to bring themselves into compliance with the law. The same lessons also generally apply to North American employers, given the high degree of comparability between American, Canadian, and New Zealand anti-discrimination laws
|Keywords||civil rights human rights regulatory compliance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
HRM Role in EEO: Sheep in Shepherd's Clothing? [REVIEW]Lynne Bennington - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):13 - 21.
The Determinants of Regulatory Compliance: An Analysis of Insider Trading Disclosures in Italy.Emanuele Bajo, Marco Bigelli, David Hillier & Barbara Petracci - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):331-343.
Accounting Window Dressing and Template Regulation: A Case Study of the Australian Credit Union Industry.David Hillier, Allan Hodgson, Peta Stevenson-Clarke & Suntharee Lhaopadchan - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):579-593.
HRM Role in EEO: Sheep in Shepherd’s Clothing?Lynne Bennington - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):13-21.
Similar books and articles
The Use of Criminal Record in Employment Decisions: The Rights of Ex-Offenders, Employers and the Public.Helen Lam & Mark Harcourt - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):237 - 252.
Adrift in a Sea of Rights: A Report Prepared for the New Zealand Education Development Foundation.Rex J. Ahdar - 2001 - New Zealand Education Development Foundation.
Does Job Function Influence Ethical Reasoning? An Adapted Wason Task Application.David M. Wasieleski & James Weber - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):187 - 199.
An Indigenous Lens Into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand.Robert J. Miller & Jacinta Ruru - manuscript
Employee Job Rights: Foundation Considerations. [REVIEW]Rick Molz - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):449 - 458.
What About the Worker?! The Move Toward Establishing a System of Rights for Employees.Joellen Riley - unknown
Law and Rule Following as Arbitrary-Excessive Rule Following and Law Following as Potentially Violating Too Many Human Rights and Freedoms and Open to Slavery Like Treatment of Persons.James Timothy Struck - unknown
Weight Discrimination in the American Workplace: Ethical Issues and Analysis. [REVIEW]Mark V. Roehling - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (2):177 - 189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #247,370 of 2,169,416 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,460 of 2,169,416 )
How can I increase my downloads?