Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):285-306 (1996)
The neglect and misinterpretation of Marshall's treatment of time led many of his followers and critics to overlook the significance of the qualifications and criticisms of equilibrium analysis in his Principles. This misinterpretation arises from a failure to fully understand the purpose and method of Marshall's analysis. Marshall's methodological struggles in Principles did not arise from an attempt to preserve the concept of competitive equilibrium in a world where increasing returns are pervasive. Rather, they emanated from an attempt at providing analytical tools capable of contributing to an understanding of the process of economic development that is continuous in time. Marshall was unable to resolve the conflict arising from ?biological? and ?mechanical? representations of such processes. The later critics of Marshall developed their analysis in terms of comparative static analysis of competitive equilibrium positions. The element of time had no role to play in such a setting.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth.Peter J. Bowler - 1990 - Journal of the History of Biology 23 (3):529-531.
A Scheme of Economic Theory.Christopher Blake & G. L. S. Shackle - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66):84.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
History and Equilibrium: A Partial Defense of Equilibrium Economics.Roger E. Backhouse - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):291-305.
Stability and Explanatory Significance of Some Simple Evolutionary Models.Brian Skyrms - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):94-113.
The Hypostatisation of the Concept of Equilibrium in Neoclassical Economics.Andy Denis - 2007 - In Valeria Mosini (ed.), Equilibrium in Economics: Scope and Limits.
Marshall—Making Wittgenstein Smile.Robert Keith Shaw - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (3):397–405.
Next Time Agamemnon Died.C. W. Marshall - 2001 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 95 (1).
Freedom From, in and Through the State: T.H. Marshall's Trinity of Rights Revisited.Zygmunt Bauman - 2005 - Theoria 44 (108):13-27.
Symposium on Marshall's Tendencies: 3 Sutton on Marshall's Tendencies: A Comment.Carl F. Christ - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):21-27.
Adjudicating Conflicting Christologies.James J. Buckley - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):117-135.
Symposium on Marshall's Tendencies: 4 Comments on Marshall's Tendencies.Eric Renault - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):29-44.
Symposium on Marshall's Tendencies: 6 Marshall's Tendencies: A Reply.John Sutton - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):55-62.
On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement.Werner Güth - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):371-392.
The Equivalence of Neo-Darwinism and Walrasian Equilibrium: In Defense of Organismus Economicus.Elias L. Khalil & Alain Marciano - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):229-248.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads14 ( #336,849 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?