Eric Christian Barnes: The paradox of predictivism [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):219-223 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/axq027

Other Versions

original Harker, David (2011) "ERIC CHRISTIAN BARNESThe Paradox of Predictivism". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62(1):219-223

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Eric Christian Barnes, The Paradox of Predictivism. [REVIEW]Clark Glymour - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
The roots of predictivism.Eric Christian Barnes - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:46-53.
Almeida, Michael J. 2008. The Metaphysics of Perfect Beings. Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. New York: Routledge. ix+ 190 pp. Baracchi, Claudia. 2008. Aristotle's Ethics as First Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ix+ 342 pp. Barnes, Eric Christian. 2008. The Paradox of Predictivism. Cambridge. [REVIEW]Prevailing Wisdom - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (1).
The Paradox of Predictivism.Eric Christian Barnes - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The No Miracle Argument and Strong Predictivism Versus Barnes.Mario Alai - 2006 - In Lorenzo Magnani & Claudia Casadio (eds.), Model Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Logical, Epistemological, and Cognitive Issues. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pp. 541-556.
Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society, by David Harker.James Elliott - 2018 - Teaching Philosophy 41 (3):318-322.
Predictivism and the periodic table.Stephen G. Brush - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):256-259.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-14

Downloads
103 (#177,892)

6 months
40 (#113,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Harker
East Tennessee State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the predilections for predictions.David Harker - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):429-453.

Add more references