Authors |
|
Abstract |
Moral norms are the rules of morality, those that people actually follow, and those that we feel people ought to follow, even when they don’t. Historically, the social sciences have been primarily concerned with describing the many forms that moral norms take in various cultures, with the emerging implication that moral norms are mere arbitrary products of culture. Philosophers, on the other hand, have been more concerned with trying to understand the nature and source of rules that all cultures ought to follow, with relatively little regard for what people actually do. The tension between the two approaches has to do with whether there are any standards higher than the whims of culture in determining right and wrong. Typically, the social sciences say “no”, pointing at the diversity of moral beliefs. Most philosophers (along with people of moral conviction) feel that there must be some deeper source of morality than the trends and fads of culture. Unfortunately, the nature and source of such standards has remained something of a mystery. Recent work on the evolution of norms has changed this picture dramatically.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Game Theory, Indirect Modeling, and the Origin of Morality.Arnon Levy - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (4):171-187.
The Most Important Thing About Climate Change.John Broome - 2010 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Public Policy: Why Ethics Matters. ANU E Press. pp. 101-16.
Evolutionary Models and the Normative Significance of Stability.Arnon Levy - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (5-6):33.
Evolutionary Game Theory.Alexander J. McKenzie & Edward N. Zalta - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of “Moral Signals”.Rory Smead - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):33-51.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Epistemic Norms, Moral Norms, and Nature Appreciation.Robert Stecker - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (3):247-264.
Moral Objectivity and Reasonable Agreement: Can Realism Be Reconciled with Kantian Constructivism?Cristina Lafont - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (1):27-51.
Andrei Marmor: Social Conventions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009, Xii + 186 Pp. [REVIEW]Jaroslav Peregrin - unknown
Morality, Practical Knowledge, and Will.James D. Wallace - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:23-36.
Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
What the Biological Sciences Can and Cannot Contribute to Ethics.Francisco Ayala - 2008 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Human Health and Stoic Moral Norms.Lawrence C. Becker - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):221 – 238.
Probing the “Moralization of Capitalism” Problem: Democratic Experimentalism and the Co-Evolution of Norms.Christian Arnsperger - unknown
Emotions, Norms, and the Genealogy of Fairness.Shaun Nichols - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):275-296.
Legal Obligation as a Duty of Deference.Kimberley Brownlee - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (6):583 - 597.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-12-22
Total views
65 ( #153,212 of 2,409,637 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,190 of 2,409,637 )
2010-12-22
Total views
65 ( #153,212 of 2,409,637 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,190 of 2,409,637 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads