Evolution of Moral Norms

Abstract

Moral norms are the rules of morality, those that people actually follow, and those that we feel people ought to follow, even when they don’t. Historically, the social sciences have been primarily concerned with describing the many forms that moral norms take in various cultures, with the emerging implication that moral norms are mere arbitrary products of culture. Philosophers, on the other hand, have been more concerned with trying to understand the nature and source of rules that all cultures ought to follow, with relatively little regard for what people actually do. The tension between the two approaches has to do with whether there are any standards higher than the whims of culture in determining right and wrong. Typically, the social sciences say “no”, pointing at the diversity of moral beliefs. Most philosophers (along with people of moral conviction) feel that there must be some deeper source of morality than the trends and fads of culture. Unfortunately, the nature and source of such standards has remained something of a mystery. Recent work on the evolution of norms has changed this picture dramatically.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Demystifying Normativity: Morality, Error Theory, and the Authority of Norms.Eline Gerritsen - 2022 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews, University of Stirling & University of Groningen
Morality, convention and conventional morality.Joseph Heath - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (3):276-293.
Evolution and Moral Ecology.Dean Timothy - 2014 - Dissertation, The University of New South Wales
Ethics for Fallible People.Chelsea Rosenthal - 2019 - Dissertation, New York University
Better than our nature.Michael Vlerick - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Epistemic Norms, Moral Norms, and Nature Appreciation.Robert Stecker - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (3):247-264.
Editor's Introduction.Michael Bishop - 2012 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7.
The Definition of Morality.John Skorupski - 1993 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35:121-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
93 (#196,061)

6 months
3 (#1,428,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Brian Skyrms
University of California, Irvine
William F. Harms
Seattle Central Community College

Citations of this work

The most important thing about climate change.John Broome - 2010 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David L. Eng (eds.), Public policy: why ethics matters. Acton, A.C.T.: ANUE Press. pp. 101-16.
Game Theory, Indirect Modeling, and the Origin of Morality.Arnon Levy - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (4):171-187.
Models, information and meaning.Marc Artiga - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 82:101284.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references