False knowledge

Abstract
I offer an epistemological defense of the thesis that it is possible to know a false proposition. (This is a companion to “The Myth of Factive Verbs,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research forthcoming.).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Infallibilism and Gettier's Legacy.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):304 - 327.
Is Structure Not Enough?Ioannis Votsis - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):879-890.
Reasons, Knowledge, and Probability.Fred I. Dretske - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):216-220.
Mmountains Are Just Mountains.Jay Garfield - 2009 - In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 71--82.
Accomplishing Accomplishment.Adam Morton - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (1):1-8.
When Does Falsehood Preclude Knowledge?Neil Feit & Andrew Cullison - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):283-304.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
5 ( #616,236 of 2,202,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature