Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):159–173 (2000)

There is an argument that government cannot be good for individuals because it causes them to act through fear of punishment, hence for nonmoral reasons. The obvious responses of accepting the conclusion (anarchism) and denying the premiss about moral motivation (utilitarianism) are first considered. Then the strategy of accepting the premiss but denying the conclusion is pursued at greater length. Some arguments of T. H. Green and B. Bosanquet which attempt to do this are considered before an independent resolution is proposed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00008.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,276
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #295,927 of 2,419,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,420 of 2,419,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes