Germline Manipulation and Our Future Worlds

American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):30-34 (2015)

Abstract
Two genetic technologies capable of making heritable changes to the human genome have revived interest in, and in some quarters a very familiar panic concerning, so-called germline interventions. These technologies are: most recently the use of CRISPR/Cas9 to edit genes in non-viable IVF zygotes and Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy the use of which was approved in principle in a landmark vote earlier this year by the United Kingdom Parliament. The possibility of using either of these techniques in humans has encountered the most violent hostility and suspicion. However it is important to be aware that much of this hostility dates back to the fears associated with In Vitro Fertilization and other reproductive technologies and by cloning; fears which were baseless at the time concerning both IVF and cloning the use of both of which have proved to be highly beneficial to humanity and which have been effectively regulated and controlled. This paper argues that CRISPR should by pursued through res..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2015.1104163
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Germline Modification and the Burden of Human Existence.John Harris - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (1):6-18.
The Value of Life.John Harris - 1986 - Mind 95 (380):533-535.
On Cloning.John Harris - 2004 - Routledge.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
How To Welcome New Technologies.John Harris - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (1):166-172.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
"Playing God" and Germline Intervention.Ted Peters - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):365-386.
Challenges of the Future.Gregory Stock - 2001 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 9.
A Humanist Analysis of Ethical Arguments Concerning Germline Genetic Engineering.Faith Louise Lagay - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-04

Total views
167 ( #47,370 of 2,280,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #62,198 of 2,280,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature