Journal of Scottish Philosophy 18 (2):193-211 (2020)

Authors
Peter Hartl
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
This paper critically examines David Berman's theological lying interpretation of Hume and identifies two types of theological lying: the denial of atheism strategy and the pious Christian strategy. It is argued that neither reading successfully establishes an atheist interpretation of Hume. Moreover, circumstantial evidence shows that Hume's position was different from that of the atheists of his time. Attributions theological lying to Hume, therefore, are unwarranted and should be rejected, even if we grant that this literary technique was used in the early-modern era. Analysing other non-theistic readings of Hume is beyond the scope of this paper. However, given that Berman presents one of most elaborated atheist reinterpretations of Hume's affirmative theistic passages, the failure of Berman's analysis shows that rejecting these passages should not be the default interpretive approach, and it is reasonable to attribute to Hume a weak, indeterminate theism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/jsp.2020.0267
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Was Hume an Atheist?Shane Andre - 1993 - Hume Studies 19 (1):141-166.
Hume's Early Memoranda, 1729-1740: The Complete Text.Ernest Campbell Mossner - 1948 - Journal of the History of Ideas 9 (4):492.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo’s “Confession” and Hume’s Soft Atheism.Benjamin S. Cordry - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.
Mysticism, Evil, and Cleanthes’ Dilemma.C. M. Lorkowski - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (1):36-48.
Hume's Associations.Ruth Weintraub - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (2):231-246.
Hume, Causation and Counterfactuals.Joshua Anderson - 2019 - Humanites Bulletin 2 (1):36-49.
Hume’s Concealed Attack on Religion and His Early Critics.James Fieser - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:431-449.
Hume's Naturalism.Andrew Pavelich - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):154-156.
Hume and Collins on Miracles.David Berman - 1980 - Hume Studies 6 (2):150-154.
Was Hume an Atheist? A Reconsideration.Tai Lee - 2011 - Filozofia 66:240-247.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-09

Total views
6 ( #1,082,884 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #214,792 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes