Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):448-449 (2008)
We commend Redish et al. for the progress they have made in bringing a measure of theoretical order to the processes that underlie drug addiction. However, incorporating information about situations in which drug users do not exhibit faulty decision-making into the theory would greatly enhance its generality and practical value. This commentary draws attention to the relevant human substance abuse literature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation.Adrian Carter, Emily Bell, Eric Racine & Wayne Hall - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (2):129-142.
Adaptive Versus Veridical Decision Making and the Frontal Lobes.E. Goldberg & K. Podell - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3):364-377.
Addiction, Procrastination, and Failure Points in Decision-Making Systems.Chrisoula Andreou - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):439-440.
Disorders of Desire: Addiction and Problems of Intimacy. [REVIEW]Helen Keane - 2004 - Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):189-204.
Addiction, Responsibility and Moral Psychology.A. M. Viens - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):17 – 19.
Faulty Judgment, Expert Opinion, and Decision-Making Capacity.Michel Silberfeld & David Checkland - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4):377-393.
The Development and Trials of a Decision-Making Model.Robert Keith Shaw, Michael A. Peters & James D. Marshall - 1986 - Evaluation Review, 10 (1):5-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads169 ( #25,437 of 2,143,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,534 of 2,143,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.