Hobbes Studies 22 (1):49-69 (2009)

Abstract
Two interpretations of Hobbes's theory of morals dominate the subject: the Egoistic Reading and the Naturalist Reading . According to ER, all of Hobbes's moral concepts are self-interested at their core. According to NR, Hobbes's Laws of Nature set down genuine moral obligations/virtues both inside of the state of nature and out. This article rejects both of these interpretations in favor of a Voluntarist Reading . On this reading, morality is an artifact of human endeavor, specifically covenanting. Unlike both ER and NR, VR takes seriously Hobbes's claim that there is “no obligation on any man which ariseth not from some act of his own”
Keywords VOLUNTARISM   OBLIGATION   HOBBES   FELICITY
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187502509X415247
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.David Gauthier - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (10):547-559.
Hobbes and Spinoza.Noel Malcolm - 1991 - Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes and Individualism.Alan Ryan - 1988 - In G. A. J. Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
Hobbes on Justice.D. D. Raphael - 1988 - In G. A. J. Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-15

Total views
37 ( #255,400 of 2,324,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #307,793 of 2,324,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes