Hooray! We're not morally responsible!

Think 8 (23):87-95 (2009)
Abstract
Being morally responsible means being blameworthy and deserving of punishment if we do wrong and praiseworthy and deserving reward if we do right. In what follows I shall argue that in all likelihood we're not morally responsible. None of us. Ever
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S147717560999008X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Free Will and Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Moral Responsibility for Actions: Epistemic and Freedom Conditions.Alfred Mele - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):101-111.
Free Will Skepticism and Personhood as a Desert Base.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 489-511.
Corporate Agency and Reduction.John R. Welch - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):409-424.
Coercion and Moral Blameworthiness.Lloyd Fields - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):135-151.
How to Be Responsible for Something Without Causing It.Carolina Sartorio - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):315–336.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-10-15

Total downloads

203 ( #20,071 of 2,169,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #186,783 of 2,169,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums