Logic as a Universal Medium or Logic as a Calculus? Husserl and the Presuppositions of “the Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth Century Philosophy”
Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):569-580 (2006)
This paper discusses Jean van Heijenoort’s (1967) and Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka’s (1986, 1997) distinction between logic as auniversal language and logic as a calculus, and its applicability to Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology. Although it is argued that Husserl’s phenomenology shares characteristics with both sides, his view of logic is closer to the model-theoretical, logic-as-calculus view. However, Husserl’s philosophy as transcendental philosophy is closer to the universalist view. This paper suggests that Husserl’s position shows that holding a model-theoretical view of logic does not necessarily imply a calculus view about the relations between language and the world. The situation calls for reflection about the distinction: It will be suggested that the applicability of the van Heijenoort and the Hintikkas distinction either has to be restricted to a particular philosopher’s views about logic, in which case no implications about his or her more general philosophical views should be inferred from it; or the distinction turns into a question of whether our human predicament is inescapable or whether it is possible, presumably by means of model theory, to obtain neutral answers to philosophical questions. Thus the distinction ultimately turns into a question about the correct method for doing philosophy
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy First Book : General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology.Edmund Husserl & Fred Kersten - 1982
Citations of this work BETA
Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective.Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.
Similar books and articles
Husserl and the Algebra of Logic: Husserl's 1896 Lectures. [REVIEW]Mirja Hartimo - 2012 - Axiomathes 22 (1):121-133.
Logic as Calculus Versus Logic as Language, Language as Calculus Versus Language as Universal Medium, and Syntax Versus Semantics.Jan Woleński - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):587-596.
The Practical Obscurity of Philosophy: Husserl's “Arbeit der Probleme der Letzten Voraussetzungen”.Kenneth Knies - 2011 - Husserl Studies 27 (2):83-104.
In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW]Philippe De Rouilhan - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
Husserl's Theory of Language as Calculus Ratiocinator.Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino - 1997 - Synthese 112 (3):303-321.
Completeness of Quantum Logic.E. -W. Stachow - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):237 - 280.
Editor's Introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, Historical Development of Modern Logic.Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):301-326.
Husserl's Logical Investigations Reconsidered.Denis Fisette (ed.) - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort.Philippe Rouilhan - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
Readings on Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations.Jitendranath Mohanty (ed.) - 1977 - M. Nijhoff.
Husserl's Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics.M. Hartimo - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (1):86-110.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads30 ( #169,213 of 2,158,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #132,568 of 2,158,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?