Language, thought, and communication

Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:270-298 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the idea that a natural language like English is in the first instance incorporated into the system of representation one thinks with. This ‘incorporation’ view is compared with a translation or ‘decoding’ view of communication. Compositional semantics makes sense only given the implausible decoding view.

Other Versions

reprint Harman, Gilbert (1999) "Language, Thought, and Communication". In Harman, Gilbert, Reasoning, meaning, and mind, pp. : Oxford University Press (1999)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,074

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language, Thought and Communication.Tadra Patniak - 1988 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3):350-351.
Language, Thought, and Communication.Robert C. Richardson - 1986 - In William Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. University of Chicago Press. pp. 263--283.
Why We Need a Question Semantics.Ivano Ciardelli - 2021 - In Moritz Cordes (ed.), Asking and Answering: Rivalling Approaches to Interrogative Methods. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto. pp. 15–47.
Language and Thought.A. P. Martinich - 2013 - In Ernie Lepore & Kurt Ludwig (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Donald Davidson. Blackwell. pp. 287–299.
Understanding Descriptions.Michael Robert O'rouke - 1995 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Envisioning Intention-Oriented Brain-to-Speech Decoding.L. Li, J. Vasil & S. Negoita - 2019 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (1-2):71-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#151,795)

6 months
6 (#907,516)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gilbert Harman
Princeton University

Citations of this work

(Nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - In Ernest LePore (ed.), New directions in semantics. Orlando: Academic Press. pp. 55–81.
What's wrong with semantic theories which make no use of propositions?Jeff Speaks - 2014 - In Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames & Jeffrey Speaks (eds.), New Thinking About Propositions. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Concepts, analysis, generics and the canberra plan.Mark Johnston & Sarah-Jane Leslie - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):113-171.
Is meaning cognized?David Balcarras - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (5):1276-1295.
References.John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett - 2011 - In John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 361-386.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references