Authors
Stevan Harnad
Université du Québec à Montréal
Abstract
Searle's celebrated Chinese Room Argument has shaken the foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Many refutations have been attempted, but none seem convincing. This paper is an attempt to sort out explicitly the assumptions and the logical, methodological and empirical points of disagreement. Searle is shown to have underestimated some features of computer modeling, but the heart of the issue turns out to be an empirical question about the scope and limits of the purely symbolic model of the mind. Nonsymbolic modeling turns out to be immune to the Chinese Room Argument. The issues discussed include the Total Turing Test, modularity, neural modeling, robotics, causality and the symbol-grounding problem
Keywords Artificial Intelligence  Indistinguishable  Logic  Mind  Turing Test  Turing, A
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,645
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Computationalism.Eric Dietrich - 1990 - Social Epistemology 4 (2):135-154.
Can Robots Make Good Models of Biological Behaviour?Barbara Webb - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1033-1050.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Status and Future of the Turing Test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Turing Test: 50 Years Later. [REVIEW]A. P. Saygin & I. Cicekli - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
Minds, Machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 1:5-25.
Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables.Stevan Harnad - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.
Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 1999 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
192 ( #46,159 of 2,349,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,414 of 2,349,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes