Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity

Blackwell (1996)
Abstract
Do moral questions have objective answers? In this great debate, Gilbert Harman explains and argues for relativism, emotivism, and moral scepticism.
Keywords Ethics  Ethical relativism  Objectivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $11.99 used (77% off)   $30.89 new (41% off)   $37.63 direct from Amazon (28% off)    Amazon page
Call number BJ1012.H316 1996
ISBN(s) 0631192115   9780631192114  
DOI 10.2307/2653640
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
No Deep Disagreement for New Relativists.Ragnar Francén - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):19--37.
Epistemology Without Metaphysics.Hartry Field - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (2):249 - 290.
The Normative Force of Reasoning.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - Noûs 40 (4):660–686.
De Dicto Internalist Cognitivism.Jon Tresan - 2006 - Noûs 40 (1):143–165.
Skepticism About Character Traits.Gilbert Harman - 2009 - Journal of Ethics 13 (2/3):235 - 242.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

340 ( #7,924 of 2,153,589 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

38 ( #7,764 of 2,153,589 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums