Moral Relativism Explained
AbstractAccording to moral relativism, there is not a single true morality. There are a variety of possible moralities or moral frames of reference, and whether something is morally right or wrong, good or bad, just or unjust, etc. is a relative matterâ€”relative to one or another morality or moral frame of reference. Something can be morally right relative to one moral frame of reference and morally wrong relative to another. It is useful to compare moral relativism to other kinds of relativism. One possible comparison is with motion relativism. There is no such thing as absolute motion or absolute rest. Whether something is moving or at rest is relative to a spatio-temporal frame of reference. Something may be at rest in one such frame of reference and moving in another. There is no such thing as absolute motion and absolute rest, but we can make do with relative motion and rest. Similarly, moral relativism is the view that, although there is no such thing as absolute right and wrong, we can make do with relative right and wrong
Similar books and articles
Rule Consequentialism and Scope.Leonard Kahn - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):631-646.
Moral Relativism and Deontic Logic.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1990 - Synthese 85 (1):139 - 152.
Three Related Objections to Relativism.Michael Wreen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:453-457.
A Coherent Moral Relativism.David Capps, Michael P. Lynch & Daniel Massey - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):413 - 430.
On the Relation Between Metaethical and Substantial Normative Forms of Moral Relativism.Christian Munthe - manuscript
Three Kinds of Relativism.Paul Boghossian - 2011 - In Steven Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Blackwell.
Cultural Relativism and the Theory of Relativity.Seungbae Park - 2014 - Filosofija. Sociologija 25 (1):44-51.
Comment on Erler: Speaker Relativism and Semantic Intuitions.Ragnar Francén - 2009 - Praxis 2 (1):30-44.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Cross-Cultural Study of Mind and Behaviour: A Word of Caution.Carles Salazar - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-18.
Disagreement, Cognitive Command, and the Indexicality of Moral Truth.Bastian Reichardt - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 42 (1):7-16.
Dismissing the Moral Sceptic: A Wittgensteinian Approach.Sasha Lawson-Frost - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (3):1235-1251.
References found in this work
No references found.