On describing colors

This paper attempts to refute the familiar sceptical argument based upon the theoretical possibility of systematic transpositions of colours in different observers? colour?vision. The force of this argument lies in its apparent demonstration that cases of transposed colour?vision would be on a quite different cognitive footing from ordinary cases of colour?blindness; since colour transposition, unlike colour?blindness, could not possibly have any effect on the use of language by a person who suffered from it. It is argued (1) that this demonstration works only if we assume the truth of a certain theory of the logical nature of our colour vocabulary, and (2) that this theory is false
Keywords Color  Description  Epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201746708601481
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Papers.J. L. Austin - 1961 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Naming the Colours.A. P. Hazen - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):224-231.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #378,118 of 2,289,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #408,430 of 2,289,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature