Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences

Erkenntnis 13 (3):407-416 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences.Rom Harré - 1975 - Clarendon Press. Edited by Rom Harré.
Book reviews : Problems of scientific revolution: Progress and obstacles to progress in the sciences. The Herbert Spencer lectures 1973. Edited by Rom Harré. Toronto: Oxford university press, 1975. Pp. VI + 104. Can. $5.75. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 1976 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (4):375-380.
Problems of scientific revolution: Progress and obstacles to progress in the sciences. [REVIEW]Michael Ruse - 1978 - Erkenntnis 13 (1):407-416.
Problems of Scientific Revolution. [REVIEW]Gavin Ardley - 1980 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 27:417-419.
Problems of Scientific Revolution. Progress and Obstacles to Progress. [REVIEW]S. Alberchi & Lecce Milella - 1976 - International Logic Review: Rassegna Internazionale di Logica 18 (13-16).
Progress as a demarcation criterion for the sciences.Paul M. Quay - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Gomte and the idea of progress.Leslie Sklair - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):321 – 331.
What is theoretical progress of science?Juha Saatsi - 2019 - Synthese 196 (2):611-631.
What is theoretical progress of science?Juha Saatsi - 2016 - Synthese:1-21.
Review symposium : Laurens Laudan. Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1977. Pp. X + 257.Laudan's progress and its problems. [REVIEW]David L. Hull, Andrew Lugg, Robert E. Butts & I. C. Jarvie - 1979 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):457-465.
Evidence-based medicine and progress in the medical sciences.Leen De Vreese - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):852-856.
Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:100-104.
The Role of Justification in the Ordinary Concept of Scientific Progress.Moti Mizrahi & Wesley Buckwalter - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):151-166.
A simple model of scientific progress - with examples.Luigi Scorzato - 2016 - In Laura Felline, Antonio Ledd, Francesco Paoli & Emanuele Rossanese (eds.), SILFS 3 - New Directions in Logic and Philosophy of Science. College Publications. pp. 45-56.
Scientific progress as accumulation of knowledge: a reply to Rowbottom.Bird Alexander - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):279-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rom Harré
Last affiliation: Oxford University

Citations of this work

The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper.David L. Hull - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Popper's Continuing Relevance.Ian Jarvie - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 217--235.
The Moral Underpinnings of Popper's Philosophy.Noretta Koertge - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 323--338.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references