Symbolic Boundaries and Collective Violence. A New Theoretical Argument for an Explanatory Sociology of Collective Violent Action


Abstract
The sociology of violence still struggles with two critical questions: What motivates people to act violently on behalf of groups and how do they come to identify with the groups for which they act? Methodologically the article addresses these puzzling problems in favor of a relational sociology that argues against both micro- and macro-reductionist accounts, while theoretically it proposes a twofold reorientation: first, it makes a plea for the so called cognitive turn in social theory; second, it proposes following praxeological accounts of social action that focus on the dynamic interpenetration of cognition and socio-cultural practices. The argument is that symbolic boundaries constitute the “missing link” that allows for overcoming the micro-macro gap in violence research: Symbolic boundaries can cause people's participation in collective violence by providing the essential relational resources for violent action and by triggering the cognitive/affective mechanisms necessary for social actors to become drawn into mobilization processes that can cause their engaging in coordinated attacks on sites across the boundary. The article offers a new theoretical argument by drawing on knowledge from violence research, social action theory and cognitive science allowing for a non-reductionist theory of action that explains how and why people engage in collective violence
Keywords symbolic boundaries  praxeology  collective violence  terrorist behavior  urban riots  action theory
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1111/jtsb.12093
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?David Premack & G. Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (4):515-629.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?David Premack & Guy Woodruff - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4):515-526.
Primate Cognition.Michael Tomasello & Josep Call - 1997 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Question of Guilt.Jens Meierhenrich - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):314-342.
Unintentional Collective Action.Sara Rachel Chant - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):245 – 256.
Violence and the Subject.Michel Wieviorka - 2003 - Thesis Eleven 73 (1):42-50.
Why is Collective Violence Collective?Roberta Senechal de la Roche - 2001 - Sociological Theory 19 (2):126-144.
Why Is Collective Violence Collective?Roberta Senechal de La Roche - 2001 - Sociological Theory 19 (2):126 - 144.
Suicide, Violence, and Cultural Conceptions of Martyrdom in Palestine.Neil L. Whitehead & Nasser Abufarha - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (2):395-416.
Rationality in Collective Action.Margaret P. Gilbert - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):3-17.
Kollektives Handeln und soziale Strukturen.Doris Gerber - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):182-198.
Collective Action and the Traditional Village.Daniel Little - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):41-58.
Acting Together.Christopher Kutz - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):1-31.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-07

Total views
31 ( #296,173 of 2,285,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #319,978 of 2,285,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature